Sunday, May 13, 2007

The Mitzvah


Sad afternoon. It was Mother's Day but Barb and I attended an open house to remember the death of Paul Raymond, a friend we met through our Temple.

Paul's life was memorialized by his wife Ellen Taussig in an hour long story telling. Weirdly, Ellen's oration explained something very important to me. How was Paul a Jew?

Paul, was born a Methodist, practiced as a Presbyterian Elder, and converted to Judaism as part of his life with Ellen. When we met, it seemed to me that Paul lived without religious conviction. I was blind. Paul lived a Jewish life even before becoming one of us. Judaism must have seemed normal to someone who grew up as a rebel in a Kansas farm town where liberalism and learning were equally irrelevant to most people's lives. Like Maya Angelou, from a young age, Paul had a drive to read and learn. His drive that was itself a form of rebellion, a rebellion familiar to every young Jew who has rebelled atg the Talmud by turning to science or law. Paul's rebellion grew to become a need, a need to learn as much as he could about history, a drive to support fairness by marching for civil rights and, later, working for voting rights.

When we first met Paul, his liberalism seemed contradictory. As a teacher in private schools, and founder of the Northwest School, Paul fought a quixotic battle .. the battle for private schools to share their excellence with all kids. Isn't this a contradiction? How can one work in a private school while serving the goals of Dr. King? While wanting all kids to have opportunities to learn, how can one teach in a school dependent on the wealthy? The Northwest School depends on the children of Seattle's wealthy for its very existence.

The NW School may well be a contradiction in a Christian sense. Would Jesus have been successful if he dined with Pilate on fine foods and taught ethics in a Roman School? St. Augustine would not have considered such a life as an act of charity. Look at the candidacy of John Edwards for President. Senator Edwards is truly devoted, I believe, to helping the poor. BUT Attorney Edward's good deeds are hurt by the millions of dollars this poverty lawyer made in class action suits . Would Jesus be Jesus without sacrifice? Listening to Ellen, I began to think more of Mr. Edwards.

In Judaism, a good deed justifies itself. We are taught to do good NOT in praise of the Deity, but because doing good is the law. In Judaism, the law exists just as the Deity exists. The law is real. The Law is the Torah and the Torah teaches good deeds, laws called Mitvot. The mitzvot exist eternally. There is no requirement for Jews to proclaim a belief in the Deity, but Jews must follow the Mitzvot. Judaism is built on the same natural law that Jefferson used as the foundation of the American system of laws. Jews hold the mitzvot to be innately true.

How does this relate to Paul Raymond? Long before meeting Ellen and becoming a jew, Paul Raymond saw his need to teach as a deed justified by itself. Paul was adamant about the need to do good things, adamant for his own life and adamant that his students learn the lessons of mitzvot from the reality of history. Just as Judaism teaches that you should do good deeds simply because they are the right thing to do, Paul taught the same thing. When Paul converted, this proud Scot joined a community whose most central belief was already Paul's practice.

Christians often ask, WWJD? One reason I am NOT a Christian in that I suspect Jesus would give charity with the blessings of his religion. Isn't the essence of Christianity the self sacrifice to appease the Deity's ire for man's sins? Charity should not be adulterated by the Deity.Who do YOU admire more Medecin sans Fronteir (an organization founded by French Jews) or World Vision? Both do good but MSF does this good simply to help others!

Bye Paul, we will miss you at Seder.

Based on a discussion from the HorsesAss.

span.fullpost {display:inline;}

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the link on the General's site. It's always wonderful to read about good people.

Anonymous said...

I don't get over here much, but this looks like one I should take on.

To answer your basic question, no, Christians do not give to charity or do good works to appease God. (This is misunderstood by more than a few Christians as well.)

The basis for Christian charity is very similar to the basis for Jewish charity. God has commanded us to love our fellow humans, and that includes helping out where we can.

While I usually try to refrain from quoting scripture, this is a case where it is necessary, in order to understand the Christian perspective.

both Leviticus and Luke ““You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”

Micah “Do justice, love mercy, walk humbly with God.”

Romans “the only obligation is to love one another. Whoever has done this has obeyed the law. The commandments, ‘Do not commit adultery; do not commit murder; do not steal; do not desire what belongs to someone else’ - all these, and any other besides, are summed up in the one command, ‘Love your neighbor as you love yourself’. If you love someone you will never do him wrong; to love, then, is to obey the whole Law”

No, about the only thing that even gets close to what you're talking about is that we are told that our sins are forgiven only to the extent that we forgive others. (Luke “Forgive us our sins, as we forgive those that sin against us”) That is a lot tougher than it sounds.

It is said that "faith without works is dead", but that simply means that a person with faith will feel compelled to do good works. In essence, if you love God and your fellow man, you will naturally want to help out however you can, while a person that claims to love God but does not care for his fellow man is either lying to himself or to others (or both).

Does that help?

SM Schwartz said...

The basis for Christian charity is very similar to the basis for Jewish charity. God has commanded us to love our fellow humans, and that includes helping out where we can.

Not really true. Their is no command in Judaism to love others. there are specific deeds one is supposed to do because the deeds themselves are good in and of themselves. We call these mitzvahs.

The Xtian concept of love is the best part of your religion IMHO.

In contrast, Judaism has no concept of salvation from sin. So when you talk about , " a person with faith will feel compelled to do good works. " this is in many ways antithetical to the Jewish concept of an ethical life style. One can be a perfectly good person while having no faith whatsoever in the Deity.
I think you also misunderstand my position on the importance of salvation in Xtianity. I am very aware of Calvinist,m inter alia, thinking about the dissociation fo works form grace. Nonetheless, the idea that one lives this life as part of a longer life with rewards or punishments in the after life is central to Xtianity and has no comparable in Judaism. This is true even for a Calvinist, even though she might ... more like a Jew ... not justify her acts by the promise of salvation.

In this way Judaism and Buddhism are more similar than either is with Christianity. The critical issue in the former religions is that acts or practices are self justified. Good deeds exist in Judaism and Buddhism because they are the right thing to do, irrespective of whether these mitzvot arise because they were deigned into the universe by the Deity or because they are, like the laws of physics, "just" part of reality.

Out another way, A Jew or a Buddhist can be an atheist with no change in her or his behavior toward others. Can Xtianity exist without Jesus?