HorsesAss.Org » Blog Archive » Follow-up to Monday’s DOC Post: "
Roger Rabbit at HA celebrates the right of prosecutors t decide NOT to enforce laws vs. marijuana. .....
As for the medical MJ issue, the whole argument is worthy of a Church lawyer! The prohibiton against THC is not based in any science. But many laws we have are not based in science. MJ is banned because of a taboo … along with polygamy, incest (with birth control), sodomy (until recently), public exposure, using the N word, burning a cross, and dozens of other things our society has created as taboos.
Which is more harmful to you … sex for pay or inhaling MJ? Maybe we need to legalize medical prostitution? I am certain there as many “patients” who would benefit from a good fuck as would benefit from smoking weed.
So, my question for Roger Rabbit, NP, JD (Nobelist of Pookahs and Divinity of Jurisprudence) is this:
Are there ANY limitations on prosecutorial justice? Could a prosecutor, in effect, legalize prostitution?"
Friday, February 12, 2010
span.fullpost {display:inline;}
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment