Eric Margolis | ||||||||||
There are two completely different versions of what is currently happening in Gaza. In the Israeli and North American press version, Hamas - 'Islamic terrorists' backed by Iran - have in an unprovoked attack fired deadly rockets on innocent Israel with the intent of destroying the Jewish state. ................
According to the UN, most of Gaza's 1.5 million Palestinian refugees subsist near the edge of hunger. Seventy per cent of Palestinian children in Gaza suffer from severe malnutrition and psychological trauma. Medical facilities are critically short of doctors, personnel, equipment, and drugs. Gaza has quite literally become a human garbage dump for all the Arabs that Israel does not want. ......................... Call it a prison riot, writ large.
This has pleased Israel's supporters in North America who have been cheering the war in Gaza and have been backing away from their earlier tentative support for a land-for-peace deal.
Arab deal killed The plan, now likely defunct, had called for Israel to withdraw to its 1967 borders and share Jerusalem in exchange for full recognition and normalised relations with the Muslim world. Arab governments will now be unable to sell the deal as they face a storm of criticism from their own people over their powerlessness to help the Palestinians of Gaza. ................. ...........................
I posted these excerpts to try and get some balance but I disagree with the author's pessimism. The Iraq war has changed the balance of power in the micro-environment around Israel. There is no strategic combination of Arab forces that can prevent Gaza from being occupied, at a terrible price to the Palestinians. However, Israel knows it can not make such an occupation long term. They will withdraw, as they did in Lebanon but this time the withdrawal will differ in two ways. First, there will be the appearance of victory. That appearance is important for Israel's politics and to provide That One with the opportunity he needs to move fro peace through strength. The trick I see is to let beneficent Arab states enter this fray as liberators of Gaza without doing so with tanks and bombs. Clinton will negotiate a peace force, perhaps under the UN flag but I hope under the banner of the Arab states. These Arabs will be able to pose, with justice, as the force that contained Israel while also providing a meaningful replacement for Hamas. This would serve MANY interests: Egypt ... The government is threatened by the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, as an arm of that movement, is a huge danger to Egypt's governing oligarchy. An Egyptian force, under an Islamic flag of peace, could be seen as heroic. Jordan .. Jordan needs a stable economy tied to Israel's economy. Israel needs a way to close the West Bank settlements but has to do it in a way that can be seen as coming from strength.
Call me an optimist. |
Monday, January 05, 2009
Al Jazeera English - War on Gaza - Israel's fait accompli in Gaza
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I will disagree that Israel is 'innocent'. It is ridiculous to blame one group 100% and give Israel a clear 'fully innocent' pass. This is the type of mentality that is so detrimental to any peace solutions.
Please note, My comments are in green and I did not use the word innocent.
That said, I would certainly call the people of Siderot and Askelon innocent, as I would the families of the Hamas leaders killed by Israel.
There is no way this thing is going to end as long as ideologic fanatics or corrupt money hungry politicians set the agenda.
That seems to me to be the hidden soilver lining here, this is a unque moment in time where the conditions exist for a shift in the paradigm.
The paradigm I would like to see is based on the needs, the simple physical needs of Palestinians, Israelis, and Jordanians. If That One can bring us That Far, good things couyld happen.
Post a Comment