Friday, July 20, 2007


Hillary Clinton's Tentative Dip Into New Neckline Territory

By Robin Givhan
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, July 20, 2007; C01

There was cleavage on display Wednesday afternoon on C-SPAN2. It belonged to Sen. Hillary Clinton.

She was talking on the Senate floor about the burdensome cost of higher education. She was wearing a rose-colored blazer over a black top. The neckline sat low on her chest and had a subtle V-shape. The cleavage registered after only a quick glance. No scrunch-faced scrutiny was necessary. There wasn't an unseemly amount of cleavage showing, but there it was. Undeniable.

It was startling to see that small acknowledgment of sexuality and femininity peeking out of the conservative -- aesthetically speaking -- environment of Congress. After all, it wasn't until the early '90s that women were even allowed to wear pants on the Senate floor. It was even more surprising to note that it was coming from Clinton, someone who has been so publicly ambivalent about style, image and the burdens of both.

The last time Clinton wore anything that was remotely sexy in a public setting surely must have been more than a decade ago, during Bill Clinton's first term in office when she was photographed wearing a black Donna Karan gown that revealed her shoulders. It was one of Karan's "cold-shoulder" dresses, inspired, Karan once noted, because a woman's shoulders remain sensuous and appealing regardless of her age.

Throughout Clinton's time as first lady, she wore clothes that were feminine and stately. But sexiness was not part of the image. Her second inaugural gown was by Oscar de la Renta. The original version of the gold lace dress had cap sleeves and a wide, jewel neckline. Clinton altered it so that it had long sleeves and a high, almost Victorian collar.

When she appeared on the cover of the December 1998 issue of Vogue, just after the Monica Lewinsky scandal had peaked, she wore another de la Renta gown, this one with a boat neck and long sleeves. She looked glamorous, regal and defiant. But one was not even tempted to mention the s-word.

By the time Clinton launched her first campaign for the Senate, she had found a desexualized uniform: a black pantsuit. Not a fitted, provocative suit, but merely an understated, flattering one. Clothes were off the table. End of discussion.

But as she has embarked on her campaign for president, she has given up the uniform. In its place has been a wide array of suits and jackets, in everything from dull khaki to canary yellow and sofa florals. Once again, she is playing the fashion field.

The cleavage, however, is an exceptional kind of flourish. After all, it's not a matter of what she's wearing but rather what's being revealed. It's tempting to say that the cleavage stirs the same kind of discomfort that might be churned up after spotting Rudy Giuliani with his shirt unbuttoned just a smidge too far. No one wants to see that. But really, it was more like catching a man with his fly unzipped. Just look away!

Not so long ago, Jacqui Smith, the new British home secretary, spoke before the House of Commons showing far more cleavage than Clinton. If Clinton's was a teasing display, then Smith's was a full-fledged come-on. But somehow it wasn't as unnerving. Perhaps that's because Smith's cleavage seemed to be presented so forthrightly. Smith's fitted jacket and her dramatic necklace combined to draw the eye directly to her bosom. There they were . . . all part of a bold, confident style package.

With Clinton, there was the sense that you were catching a surreptitious glimpse at something private. You were intruding -- being a voyeur. Showing cleavage is a request to be engaged in a particular way. It doesn't necessarily mean that a woman is asking to be objectified, but it does suggest a certain confidence and physical ease. It means that a woman is content being perceived as a sexual person in addition to being seen as someone who is intelligent, authoritative, witty and whatever else might define her personality. It also means that she feels that all those other characteristics are so apparent and undeniable, that they will not be overshadowed.

To display cleavage in a setting that does not involve cocktails and hors d'oeuvres is a provocation. It requires that a woman be utterly at ease in her skin, coolly confident about her appearance, unflinching about her sense of style. Any hint of ambivalence makes everyone uncomfortable. And in matters of style, Clinton is as noncommittal as ever.

span.fullpost {display:inline;}

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

I don't see what the fuss is all about. For pete's sake we must show at least some maturity here. Don't forget how the so called fundamentalist Pakistan has accepted Benazir Bhutto in all her glorious mini skirts and strutting while bikini clad on the beach. If a third world, fundamentalist, extremist country like Pakistan can afford that kind of "tolerance" towards Benazir Bhutto, I find it really funny and disgusting that we are even discussing Hilary Clinton like that, right here in the US of A.

To have a comparison of what I am talking about, compare how scantily clad benazir bhutto is as compared to Hillary clinton, click the link below

http://www.flickr.com/photos/agha_bhaijan/261487421

SM Schwartz said...

The funniest part of all this is the fuss made of the picture of the bare chested Mr. Obama in his speedo, six pack evident and package intact. OB made an appropriate statement of m,ale modesty.

SM Schwartz said...

I was also struck by HRC's performance at the UTube:CNN athon. Although I remain a committed Obamite and am skeptical about the ability of anyone to evaluate a candidate from a TV set, based only on the tube I would give her and Richardson my highest marks.

She is obviously VERY bright. She also thinks very well and very fast. My main concern about Hillary is WHAT does she believe in. For the most part, other than Iraq, her views are predictable. Standard Liberal fare. I would like to see what she thinks about issues where standard POVs do not fare well e.g. immigration or gloabl economics. Unfortunately, given the nature of US campaigns. we are unlikely to learn anything about this until Jan 21, 09.

hilaryhaswrinklymelons said...

Oh my lord! I am sorry but the last thing I wanna see are Hilary Clinton's boobs falling out of her top! Does she think she is a Victoria's Secret Model? I have one thing to say to her... StupidSluttyBeotch who need a makeover. Oh! Have you seen her new hairdo? You know w/ the dumb freaking headband? I don't think she realizes that there are these things called modesty and age. If you want to be a popular politician for the RIGHT reasons, then it is best to dress apropriately and NOT TRY TO SEDUCE PEOPLE WHO PROBABLY DO NOT EVEN WANT TO SEE THOSE WRINKLY MELONS!